Get Me Great Skin!  
 



Adult Dermatology
Pediatric Dermatology
Laser Procedures
Cosmetic Procedures
Plastic Surgery
Skin Cancer Diagnosis & Treatment
Aesthetician Services
PATIENT CORNER
 
HOME ABOUT US OUR LOCATIONS OUR DOCTORS OUR DRS. IN THE NEWS MONTHLY SPECIALS EMPLOYMENT CONTACT US
CoolTouch Endovenous Laser Ablation (CTEV)
 

AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LASER MEDICINE AND SURGERY TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL MEETING DALLAS, TEXAS MARCH 31-APRIL 4, 2004 ABSTRACTS

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT IMPROVEMENT ANALYSES FOLOWING NON-ABLATIVE TREATMENT
By David J. Goldberg, A. Rogashefsky, S. Hawkins, C. Feinberg, U. Santhanam, M. Green, and B. Parish
 

Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of NY/NJ, New York, NJ Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY Unilever Research and Development, Edgewater, NJ

Background and Objectives: Despite high patient satisfaction, subjective clinical improvement after non-ablative treatments are often difficult to document. Varied objective tests have been used to quantify results. The purpose of this study was to compare a variety of objective measurements that document efficacy after non-ablative laser treatment.

Study Design/Materials and Methods: Twelve subjects received 5 full-face 1,320 nm Nd:YAG non-ablative laser treatments. All subjects were followed for 6 months after treatment. Objective improvement analyses were made of changes in skin firmness with balistometric analysis; improvement in skin texture with both full face digital screening and optical 3D profilometry; and changes in structural changes with protein analyzes.

Results: Significant improvement in skin firmness and elasticity was seen with balistomteric evaluation. Facial scanner analysis showed improvement both in depth of facial rhytides, with individual improvement up to 60%, and in length of rhytides with individual improvement up to 100%. Optical 3D profilometric analyses showed both improvement in depth of rhytides,. with individual improvement up to 28%, and microtexture with individual improvement up to 22%. Finally, post non-ablative treatment protein analyzes showed increases in procollagen I, fillagrin and proliferating cell nuclear antigen, all markers of wound repair.

Conclusions: A wide variety of objective analyzes confirm the subjective changes seen after non-ablative treatment