Get Me Great Skin!  
 



Adult Dermatology
Pediatric Dermatology
Laser Procedures
Cosmetic Procedures
Plastic Surgery
Skin Cancer Diagnosis & Treatment
Aesthetician Services
PATIENT CORNER
 
HOME ABOUT US OUR LOCATIONS OUR DOCTORS OUR DRS. IN THE NEWS MONTHLY SPECIALS EMPLOYMENT CONTACT US
CoolTouch Endovenous Laser Ablation (CTEV)

SCIENCE BACKS UP EFFICACY OF NONABLATIVE SKIN REJUVENATION

By Lisette Hilton
 

Dallas - The verdict is in: nonablative laser facial therapy is more than just hocus-pocus. A new study looking at a variety of objective measurements doc­umented efficacy in three areas of facial skin improvement.

"We have all of these cosmetically ele­gant nonablative treatments of the skin in which clinical results are often difficult to see; yet, there is, for the most part, high patient satisfaction. [Our] purpose ... was to look at and compare a variety of objec­tive measures and document efficacy after nonablative laser treatment," said the study's lead author, David J. Goldberg, M.D., direc­tor of Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of New York and New Jersey and clinical pro­fessor of dermatology and director of laser research and Mohs surgery at Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York.

The researchers studied 12 women, ages 20 to 60. Each woman received five treat­ments, a month apart, with the Cool Touch Laser II, a 1320-nm Nd: YAG laser. (Cool Touch provided no funding for the study.) The full-face treatment included a first pass with pretreatment dynamic spray cooling and fluences of 15 J/cm2 to 18 J/cm2. The second pass utilized a fluence of 15 J/cm2 with post-treatment dynam­ic spray cooling. The authors measured changes in skin firmness, skin texture and structural protein changes in the skin.

They used a ballistometric analysis to measure skin firmness. Skin Textural changes were measure with full face digital scanning, which picks up the curves textural changes of the skin, and the Primos Optical 3D Profiler, which measure the peaks and troughs of the skin. They measured structural analysis by looking at protein changes.

The researchers found significant improve­ment in the depth of facial rhytides, with individual improvement up to 60 percent; improvement in the length of rhytides of up to 100 percent for individuals. There was change in the course wrinkles of the nasolabial folds. They also found signifi­cant improvement in the depth of the rhytides of up to 28 percent in individual patients, as well as improvement in the microtexture of the cheek area, with indi­vidual improvement up to 22 percent.

The researchers looked at Promos results one month and four months after the last treatments. Microtexture of the cheek and eye skin improved about four per­cent a month after the last treatment and continued to improve up to 27 percent around the eyes and 10 percent on the cheeks after four months.

"Because we know that nonablative lasers work by creating a wound and prompting collagen formation during wound repair, we also looked at three proteins associat­ed with new collagen formation: procolla­gen 1, filaggrin and proliferating cell nucle­ar antigen," Dr. Goldberg said. "All three were increased significantly after nonabla­tive laser treatment, with continued improve­ment at four months post-treatment."

The authors concluded that they were able to consistently show from objective measurements that nonablative treat­ments are efficacious and that patients' impressions are true, "even if we cannot well document that with photography," according to Dr. Goldberg.

The next goal in research should be to improve existing therapies, according to Dr. Goldberg. "There was a school of thought that said, 'Dump all these machines; we need to find a new technology.' This study proves that these technologies work - we just have to make them better." CST

Unilever Research and Development, Edgewater, N.J., partially funded the study mentioned in this story.